GGP.L vs. HYMC
GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, GGP.L returned 11.99%/yr vs -3.46%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGP.L vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGP.L is traded in GBp, while HYMC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYMC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 0.17% return.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -16.85%
- YTD
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 84.70%
- 3Y*
- 61.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 59.55%
HYMC
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -28.05%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 675.14%
- 3Y*
- 96.61%
- 5Y*
- -3.46%
- 10Y*
- —
GGP.L vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 16.92% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | 220.35% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.17% | 898.94% | -8.22% | -56.26% | -2.99% | -92.11% | -26.26% | 0.15% | 13.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and HYMC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, GGP.L and HYMC have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GGP.L:
£4.17B
HYMC:
$2.10B
GGP.L:
£0.47
HYMC:
-$1.44
GGP.L:
4.95
HYMC:
9.38
GGP.L:
£937.29M
HYMC:
$0.00
GGP.L:
£483.25M
HYMC:
-$4.65M
GGP.L:
£477.73M
HYMC:
-$69.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
HYMC
GGP.L vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGP.L | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.51 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 11.29 | -8.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 27.61 | -20.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, roughly equal to the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.49% | -98.83% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.07% | -60.37% | +28.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.65% | -62.15% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.50% | -93.24% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.29% | -85.32% | +62.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -64.18% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 24.63% | -11.93% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) is 20.24%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.03%. This indicates that GGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.24% | 26.03% | -5.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.51% | 84.29% | -39.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.07% | 116.89% | -52.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.16% | 152.26% | -87.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.86% | 122.43% | -31.57% |
Dividends
GGP.L vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGP.L nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GGP.L vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greatland Gold plc and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GGP.L and HYMC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GGP.L and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer