PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGP.L vs. ATYM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than ATYM.L's -4.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L has outperformed ATYM.L with an annualized return of 59.55%, while ATYM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 24.45% annualized return.


GGP.L

1D
-3.71%
1M
-16.85%
YTD
16.92%
6M
16.74%
1Y
84.70%
3Y*
61.76%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
59.55%

ATYM.L

1D
4.08%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-5.06%
1Y
82.02%
3Y*
38.85%
5Y*
25.14%
10Y*
24.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGP.L
Greatland Gold plc
16.92%309.83%-35.50%23.25%-50.00%-56.64%1,950.00%-0.55%-3.21%1,000.00%
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
-4.50%141.04%0.93%11.73%-18.78%88.92%22.40%-8.35%26.97%35.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GGP.L and ATYM.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2006

0.06

Over the past year, GGP.L and ATYM.L have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GGP.L:

£4.17B

ATYM.L:

£1.27B

EPS

GGP.L:

£0.47

ATYM.L:

€0.55

PE Ratio

GGP.L:

13.03

ATYM.L:

17.13

PS Ratio

GGP.L:

4.45

ATYM.L:

3.02

PB Ratio

GGP.L:

4.95

ATYM.L:

1.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

GGP.L:

£937.29M

ATYM.L:

€473.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GGP.L:

£483.25M

ATYM.L:

€148.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

GGP.L:

£477.73M

ATYM.L:

€170.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGP.L
GGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GGP.LATYM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.24

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

5.43

+1.21

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGP.L and ATYM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, which is greater than ATYM.L's maximum drawdown of -93.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and ATYM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGP.LATYM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.49%

-93.06%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.07%

-36.50%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.65%

-36.87%

-18.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.50%

-57.50%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.35%

-68.65%

-17.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.29%

-23.98%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-62.66%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.70%

15.05%

-2.35%

Volatility

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Volatility Comparison

Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 20.24% compared to Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) at 16.09%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATYM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGP.LATYM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.24%

16.09%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.51%

38.84%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.07%

45.66%

+18.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.16%

40.27%

+24.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.86%

39.47%

+51.39%

Dividends

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Dividend Comparison

GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.75%0.71%1.71%1.91%0.91%7.14%
GGP.L
Greatland Gold plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greatland Gold plc and Atalaya Mining Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
478.24M
120.87M
(GGP.L) Total Revenue
(ATYM.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GGP.L values in GBP, ATYM.L values in EUR

GGP.L vs. ATYM.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Greatland Gold plc and Atalaya Mining Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.3%
35.9%
Portfolio components
GGP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

ATYM.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a gross profit of 43.43M and revenue of 120.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

GGP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

ATYM.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported an operating income of 37.65M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.2%.

GGP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.

ATYM.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a net income of 28.39M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GGP.L and ATYM.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGP.L and ATYM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer