PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATYM.L vs. MARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Different Trading Currencies

ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while MARA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MARA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -12.98% return, which is significantly lower than MARA's -1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of 24.34%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -11.35% annualized return.


ATYM.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
-22.98%
YTD
-12.98%
6M
12.56%
1Y
134.93%
3Y*
32.05%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
24.34%

MARA

1D
9.02%
1M
-5.19%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
-52.83%
1Y
-23.14%
3Y*
-1.00%
5Y*
-28.53%
10Y*
-11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
-12.98%141.03%0.93%11.73%-17.55%88.92%22.40%-8.35%26.97%35.25%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
-1.17%-50.27%-27.36%552.51%-88.35%217.73%1,049.69%-41.48%-90.64%-45.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and MARA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. They neither move together nor in opposition — each responds to its own set of market drivers. This independence makes them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Fundamentals

EPS

ATYM.L:

£0.58

MARA:

-$4.32

PS Ratio

ATYM.L:

2.28

MARA:

2.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATYM.L:

£483.34M

MARA:

$907.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATYM.L:

£150.91M

MARA:

$576.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATYM.L:

£170.14M

MARA:

-$559.37M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATYM.LMARADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

-0.38

+3.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

-0.08

+3.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.99

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

-0.40

+4.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.21

-0.75

+15.96

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and MARA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATYM.LMARADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

-0.38

+3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

-0.27

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

-0.08

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

-0.10

+0.21

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and MARA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ATYM.LMARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.04%

-99.74%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.50%

-70.53%

+34.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.48%

-95.87%

+38.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.65%

-99.20%

+30.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.73%

-94.37%

+63.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.14%

-77.83%

+15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.87%

37.38%

-28.51%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) is 19.82%, while Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a volatility of 24.10%. This indicates that ATYM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ATYM.LMARADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.82%

24.10%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.39%

61.28%

-26.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.54%

81.51%

-36.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.20%

105.86%

-66.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.29%

142.84%

-103.55%

Dividends

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.82%0.71%1.72%1.91%2.12%7.14%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ATYM.L vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atalaya Mining Ltd and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
121.84M
202.31M
(ATYM.L) Total Revenue
(MARA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATYM.L values in GBp, MARA values in USD