PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Different Trading Currencies

ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while BTC-USD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTC-USD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -12.98% return, which is significantly higher than BTC-USD's -21.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L has underperformed BTC-USD with an annualized return of 24.34%, while BTC-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 67.12% annualized return.


ATYM.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
-22.98%
YTD
-12.98%
6M
12.56%
1Y
134.93%
3Y*
32.05%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
24.34%

BTC-USD

1D
0.22%
1M
-6.72%
YTD
-21.93%
6M
-44.14%
1Y
-20.12%
3Y*
31.02%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
67.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
-12.98%141.03%0.93%11.73%-17.55%88.92%22.40%-8.35%26.97%35.25%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-21.93%-12.95%125.81%140.73%-59.81%60.91%292.68%86.71%-73.15%1,284.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and BTC-USD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. They neither move together nor in opposition — each responds to its own set of market drivers. This independence makes them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC-USD
BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATYM.LBTC-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

-0.46

+3.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

-0.41

+3.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.95

+0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

-1.10

+4.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.21

-1.98

+17.19

ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and BTC-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATYM.LBTC-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

-0.46

+3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.06

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.99

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

1.21

-1.09

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, which is greater than BTC-USD's maximum drawdown of -84.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and BTC-USD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ATYM.LBTC-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.04%

-85.30%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.50%

-49.65%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.48%

-76.67%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.65%

-83.80%

+15.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.73%

-46.36%

+15.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.14%

-42.00%

-20.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.87%

27.91%

-19.04%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison

Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a higher volatility of 19.82% compared to Bitcoin (BTC-USD) at 11.80%. This indicates that ATYM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ATYM.LBTC-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.82%

11.80%

+8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.39%

34.97%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.54%

35.97%

+8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.20%

46.46%

-7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.29%

56.09%

-16.80%