PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATYM.L vs. FCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while FCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FCX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than FCX's 40.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L has outperformed FCX with an annualized return of 24.18%, while FCX has yielded a comparatively lower 22.43% annualized return.


ATYM.L

1D
-2.17%
1M
15.09%
YTD
0.35%
6M
15.79%
1Y
96.23%
3Y*
41.16%
5Y*
23.68%
10Y*
24.18%

FCX

1D
-1.24%
1M
28.15%
YTD
40.25%
6M
58.54%
1Y
78.83%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
22.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.35%141.03%0.93%11.73%-17.55%88.92%22.40%-8.35%26.97%35.25%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
40.25%25.76%-7.83%8.00%3.05%62.94%93.21%24.66%-41.85%31.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and FCX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.16

Over the past year, ATYM.L and FCX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATYM.L:

£1.34B

FCX:

$102.00B

EPS

ATYM.L:

£0.56

FCX:

$1.89

PE Ratio

ATYM.L:

15.38

FCX:

37.31

PS Ratio

ATYM.L:

2.71

FCX:

3.86

PB Ratio

ATYM.L:

1.75

FCX:

5.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATYM.L:

£473.55M

FCX:

$26.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATYM.L:

£148.66M

FCX:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATYM.L:

£170.88M

FCX:

$9.59B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. FCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FCX
FCX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATYM.LFCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

1.74

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

2.06

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.37

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.10

8.78

-1.68

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the FCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and FCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATYM.LFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.74

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.33

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.48

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.14

-0.01

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FCX drawdown of -91.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and FCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATYM.LFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.04%

-91.87%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.50%

-23.53%

-12.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.87%

-47.11%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.48%

-47.11%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.65%

-67.79%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

-1.24%

-18.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.85%

-39.67%

-22.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.50%

9.00%

+4.50%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Volatility Comparison

Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) at 14.12%. This indicates that ATYM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATYM.LFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.11%

14.12%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.24%

33.82%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.49%

45.53%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.78%

42.14%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.30%

46.60%

-7.30%

Dividends

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Dividend Comparison

ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FCX's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.71%0.71%1.72%1.91%2.12%7.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
0.85%1.18%1.58%1.41%0.99%0.54%0.19%1.52%1.45%0.00%0.00%8.46%

Financials

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atalaya Mining Ltd and Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
120.87M
6.23B
(ATYM.L) Total Revenue
(FCX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATYM.L values in GBp, FCX values in USD

ATYM.L vs. FCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atalaya Mining Ltd and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
35.9%
26.6%
Portfolio components
ATYM.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a gross profit of 43.43M and revenue of 120.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

FCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

ATYM.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported an operating income of 37.65M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.2%.

FCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported an operating income of 2.14B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.

ATYM.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a net income of 28.39M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.

FCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a net income of 881.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATYM.L and FCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATYM.L and FCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer