GFLW vs. CCOR
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR).
GFLW and CCOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GFLW is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2024. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017.
Performance
GFLW vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFLW vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | -6.62% | 18.40% | -6.12% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -0.34% | 3.52% | -2.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFLW achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.34% return.
GFLW
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- 1Y
- 21.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- -3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFLW vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFLW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFLW vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
GFLW
CCOR
GFLW vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFLW | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | -0.14 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | -0.14 | +1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.98 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | -0.19 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | -0.35 | +5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFLW | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | -0.14 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.15 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFLW and CCOR is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GFLW vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
GFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
GFLW vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFLW drawdown since its inception was -24.14%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFLW and CCOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFLW | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.14% | -22.99% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -9.17% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.10% | -17.23% | +6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -7.07% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 4.95% | -0.51% |
Volatility
GFLW vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that GFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFLW | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 2.17% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 5.44% | +9.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.54% | 10.74% | +13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 11.13% | +13.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 10.81% | +14.25% |