GDXJ vs. FNGS
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDXJ returned 16.23%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.
Performance
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 6.79% return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -17.04%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 49.74%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 29.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 14.58% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 6.79% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and FNGS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.26 |
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXJ
FNGS
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDXJ
FNGS
-
Communication Services
GDXJ
-
FNGS
Consumer Cyclical
GDXJ
-
FNGS
Consumer Defensive
GDXJ
-
FNGS
-
Energy
GDXJ
-
FNGS
-
Financial Services
GDXJ
-
FNGS
Healthcare
GDXJ
-
FNGS
-
Industrials
GDXJ
-
FNGS
-
Real Estate
GDXJ
-
FNGS
-
Technology
GDXJ
-
FNGS
Utilities
GDXJ
-
FNGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
FNGS
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXJ | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.75 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 2.12 | +1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -48.98% | -39.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.47% | -22.93% | -16.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.47% | -26.77% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.08% | -48.98% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.25% | -9.63% | -23.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.45% | -10.85% | -49.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.41% | 8.05% | +6.36% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.46% | 8.74% | +10.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.41% | 17.19% | +26.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.54% | 21.65% | +29.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.50% | 30.10% | +11.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 31.17% | +13.06% |
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and FNGS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs FNGS's -48.98%.
On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 19.76% vs 16.23% for GDXJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 16.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FNGS.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.58% for FNGS.
GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer