GDXJ vs. GLD
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD).
GDXJ and GLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004. Both GDXJ and GLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDXJ or GLD.
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and GLD is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GDXJ vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GDXJ:
0.38
GLD:
1.78
GDXJ:
0.76
GLD:
2.38
GDXJ:
1.09
GLD:
1.31
GDXJ:
0.18
GLD:
3.29
GDXJ:
1.41
GLD:
9.45
GDXJ:
9.60%
GLD:
2.82%
GDXJ:
35.97%
GLD:
14.99%
GDXJ:
-88.66%
GLD:
-45.56%
GDXJ:
-67.45%
GLD:
-6.95%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 25.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 8.33%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.
GDXJ
16.14%
-8.61%
1.62%
17.10%
3.89%
8.33%
GLD
25.33%
-1.50%
9.83%
27.38%
11.45%
7.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDXJ vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDXJ vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDXJ nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% |
GLD SPDR Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GDXJ vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) at 5.12%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.