GDXJ vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
GDXJ and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both GDXJ and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDXJ or GLDM.
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and GLDM is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GDXJ vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GDXJ:
0.38
GLDM:
1.82
GDXJ:
0.76
GLDM:
2.43
GDXJ:
1.09
GLDM:
1.32
GDXJ:
0.18
GLDM:
3.35
GDXJ:
1.41
GLDM:
9.65
GDXJ:
9.60%
GLDM:
2.80%
GDXJ:
35.97%
GLDM:
14.86%
GDXJ:
-88.66%
GLDM:
-21.63%
GDXJ:
-67.45%
GLDM:
-6.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 25.74% return.
GDXJ
16.14%
-8.61%
1.62%
17.10%
3.89%
8.33%
GLDM
25.74%
-1.42%
10.03%
27.77%
11.82%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDXJ vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDXJ vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDXJ nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GDXJ vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.08%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.