PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDXJ vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GDXJ vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
10.08%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
10.48%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GDXJ having a 10.08% return and IAU slightly higher at 10.48%. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 17.88%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 14.27% annualized return.


GDXJ

1D
4.34%
1M
-19.21%
YTD
10.08%
6M
28.26%
1Y
125.16%
3Y*
49.66%
5Y*
23.75%
10Y*
17.88%

IAU

1D
1.72%
1M
-10.66%
YTD
10.48%
6M
23.05%
1Y
52.36%
3Y*
33.88%
5Y*
22.19%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDXJ vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXJ has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXJIAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

1.90

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

2.33

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.72

+1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.05

9.95

+3.09

GDXJ vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and IAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXJIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.90

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.26

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.90

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.65

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and IAU is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GDXJ vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.12%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and IAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXJIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.66%

-45.14%

-43.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.92%

-19.18%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.76%

-20.93%

-30.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

-21.82%

-35.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.81%

-11.71%

-8.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.90%

-15.98%

-44.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

5.23%

+4.28%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 10.44%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GDXJIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.46%

10.44%

+9.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.52%

24.15%

+18.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.91%

27.64%

+23.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.57%

17.70%

+22.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.46%

15.83%

+28.63%