GDX vs. GLL
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 10.48%/yr vs -20.73%/yr for GLL. At a correlation of -0.77, they often move in opposite directions. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLL.
Performance
GDX vs. GLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -14.46% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's 3.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed GLL with an annualized return of 10.48%, while GLL has yielded a comparatively lower -20.73% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -23.35%
- YTD
- -14.46%
- 1Y
- 40.98%
- 3Y*
- 33.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
GLL
- 1D
- 5.23%
- 1M
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 18.09%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- -37.13%
- 3Y*
- -37.68%
- 5Y*
- -26.90%
- 10Y*
- -20.73%
GDX vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -14.46% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 3.86% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and GLL is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008 | -0.77 |
The correlation between GDX and GLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
GLL
GDX vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDX | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.57 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | -0.84 | +3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDX vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, smaller than the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and GLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -99.24% | +18.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.66% | -65.10% | +28.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.66% | -87.95% | +51.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -89.76% | +43.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -95.76% | +45.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.66% | -98.71% | +62.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.39% | -85.19% | +44.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.85% | 44.14% | -28.29% |
Volatility
GDX vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) have volatilities of 14.73% and 15.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 15.04% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.96% | 46.46% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.08% | 55.09% | -7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.07% | 36.69% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.36% | 32.42% | +4.94% |
GDX vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than GLL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.86% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and GLL have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLL has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to GDX (14.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs GLL's -99.24%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 10.48% vs -20.73% for GLL. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 14.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 10.48% return vs -20.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.95% for GLL.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and GLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer