GDX vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
GDX and GDXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. It was launched on May 22, 2006. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. Both GDX and GDXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDX or GDXJ.
Performance
GDX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 25.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 7.64%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.
GDX
21.64%
-12.73%
6.40%
31.25%
8.49%
7.64%
GDXJ
25.75%
-11.80%
6.45%
35.23%
6.50%
6.48%
Key characteristics
| GDX | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.59 | 1.62 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.61 | 0.50 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.32 | 4.38 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.97% | 8.80% |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.18% | 36.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -80.57% | -88.66% |
| Current Drawdown | -36.40% | -64.76% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and GDXJ is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GDX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than GDXJ's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 1.33% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% | 0.66% | 0.90% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and GDXJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GDX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) have volatilities of 10.34% and 10.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.