GDX vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
GDX and GDXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. It was launched on May 22, 2006. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. Both GDX and GDXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDX or GDXJ.
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and GDXJ is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GDX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GDX:
0.40
GDXJ:
0.50
GDX:
0.76
GDXJ:
0.92
GDX:
1.09
GDXJ:
1.11
GDX:
0.23
GDXJ:
0.23
GDX:
1.40
GDXJ:
1.86
GDX:
9.19%
GDXJ:
9.68%
GDX:
31.81%
GDXJ:
35.84%
GDX:
-80.57%
GDXJ:
-88.66%
GDX:
-41.44%
GDXJ:
-67.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 17.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 8.18%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.61% annualized return.
GDX
12.00%
-7.93%
2.18%
10.78%
6.40%
8.18%
GDXJ
17.04%
-6.92%
4.60%
14.95%
4.05%
8.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GDX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDX nor GDXJ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% | 0.66% | 0.90% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and GDXJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GDX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is 9.40%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that GDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.