GDT vs. QGRW
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW).
GDT and QGRW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDT is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Jan 22, 2026. QGRW is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2022.
Performance
GDT vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDT vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -2.55% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | -7.94% |
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRW
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -7.80%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 22.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDT vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
QGRW
GDT vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | 1.32 | -1.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and QGRW is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GDT vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, which matches QGRW's 0.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and QGRW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -24.40% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.04% | -10.67% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -3.33% | -4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.83% | 24.20% | +18.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.83% | 21.23% | +21.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.83% | 21.23% | +21.60% |