GDT vs. QGRW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. GDT is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

GDT vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GDT

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -2.50%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.75%
• 6M: 11.89%
• YTD: 13.38%
• 1Y: 26.46%
• 3Y*: 26.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	-14.24%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GDT and QGRW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

GDT vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 47
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDT vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDT	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.16	—

Drawdowns

GDT vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, roughly equal to the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDT	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.66%	-24.40%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.43%	-3.07%	-19.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-3.30%	-8.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDT	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	18.80%	+13.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.91%	21.23%	+10.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	21.23%	+10.68%

GDT vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDT vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	2.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDT and QGRW in my portfolio?

GDT and QGRW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDT or QGRW?

On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDT or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDT or QGRW?

GDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between GDT and QGRW?

GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.28% for QGRW.