GDT vs. ARP
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and ARP (Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for ARP.
Performance
GDT vs. ARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARP
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -7.26% |
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and ARP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
ARP
GDT vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 1.37 | -1.94 |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, which is greater than ARP's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and ARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -10.13% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.35% | 0.00% | -15.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -1.82% | -8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.53% | 13.54% | +19.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.53% | 10.07% | +23.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.53% | 10.07% | +23.46% |
GDT vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than ARP's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 5.84% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 2.67% | 0.06% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and ARP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.
ARP has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 1.75% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PMV. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 1.42% for ARP.
Find the right allocation for GDT and ARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer