GDT vs. RHTX
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and RHTX (RH Tactical Outlook ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RHTX.
Performance
GDT vs. RHTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHTX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. RHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.30% |
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF | -0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and RHTX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. RHTX — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHTX
GDT vs. RHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | RHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. RHTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum RHTX drawdown of -24.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and RHTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | RHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -24.68% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.49% | -4.38% | -18.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -9.55% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.69% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. RHTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | RHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.99% | 15.77% | +17.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 18.06% | +14.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 18.06% | +14.93% |
GDT vs. RHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RHTX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. RHTX - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while RHTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.91% |
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and RHTX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for RHTX.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 1.38% for RHTX.
Find the right allocation for GDT and RHTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer