PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDT vs. ESBG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDT vs. ESBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GDT

1D
-1.60%
1M
-8.60%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESBG

1D
-1.81%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
-2.05%
6M
-5.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. ESBG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDT and ESBG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDT vs. ESBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDT vs. ESBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDT vs. ESBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than ESBG's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and ESBG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDTESBGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-18.84%

-3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.49%

-16.94%

-5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-6.94%

-4.09%

Volatility

GDT vs. ESBG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDTESBGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.99%

26.28%

+6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.99%

26.28%

+6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.99%

26.28%

+6.71%

GDT vs. ESBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ESBG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDT vs. ESBG - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than ESBG's 0.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GDT and ESBG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.

GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.62% for ESBG.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.95% for ESBG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDT and ESBG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer