GDT vs. TBFG
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.
Performance
GDT vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFG
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 8.68%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 21.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.30% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 6.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and TBFG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBFG
GDT vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than TBFG's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and TBFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -13.43% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.49% | -1.87% | -20.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -1.62% | -9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.81% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.99% | 10.55% | +22.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 11.18% | +21.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 11.18% | +21.81% |
GDT vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than TBFG's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 2.39% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and TBFG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for TBFG.
TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.91% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.42% for TBFG.
Find the right allocation for GDT and TBFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer