PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRW vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRW vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 10.06% return.


QGRW

1D
2.15%
1M
-0.09%
6M
10.31%
YTD
10.91%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.48%

SPYG

1D
1.45%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.50%
YTD
10.06%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
7.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.15M$14.16M$19.72M
$321.11M$273.47M$308.09M

QGRW vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
10.91%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.07%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.06%22.09%35.99%30.02%-5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRW and SPYG is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022

0.97

The correlation between QGRW and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

QGRW vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QGRW
SPYG

Technology

50.7%
52.3%

Communication Services

15.4%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
8.6%

Industrials

9.3%
6.4%

Healthcare

5.5%
6.2%

Financial Services

3.7%
8.7%

Utilities

0.9%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
1.0%

Energy

0.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

QGRW
50.7%
SPYG
52.3%

Communication Services

QGRW
15.4%
SPYG
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QGRW
13.4%
SPYG
8.6%

Industrials

QGRW
9.3%
SPYG
6.4%

Healthcare

QGRW
5.5%
SPYG
6.2%

Financial Services

QGRW
3.7%
SPYG
8.7%

Utilities

QGRW
0.9%
SPYG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

QGRW
0.5%
SPYG
1.0%

Energy

QGRW
0.5%
SPYG
0.1%

Basic Materials

QGRW

-

SPYG
0.3%

Real Estate

QGRW

-

SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRW vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QGRW vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QGRWSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

5.17

-0.73

QGRW vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRW and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QGRW vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRWSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-67.63%

+43.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-13.76%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-22.14%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.19%

-4.33%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-24.20%

+20.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

3.78%

+0.73%

Volatility

QGRW vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 5.89% and 6.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRWSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

6.08%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

14.85%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

18.18%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

21.50%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

20.79%

+0.45%

QGRW vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRW vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than SPYG's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.08%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.49%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QGRW and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to QGRW (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 24.09% vs 24.04% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QGRW has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 24.09% return vs 24.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

QGRW is categorized as Quality Factor, while SPYG is S&P 500. QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRW and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer