QGRW vs. IWY
QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index while IWY tracks the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QGRW returned 29.55%/yr vs 26.07%/yr for IWY. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.
Performance
QGRW vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 8.73% return.
QGRW
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 10.37%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 7.07%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.12%
- 10Y*
- 19.74%
QGRW vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 16.64% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.30% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 8.73% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -3.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRW and IWY is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between QGRW and IWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRW vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRW
IWY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QGRW
IWY
Communication Services
QGRW
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
QGRW
IWY
Industrials
QGRW
IWY
Healthcare
QGRW
IWY
Financial Services
QGRW
IWY
Energy
QGRW
IWY
Consumer Defensive
QGRW
IWY
Utilities
QGRW
IWY
Basic Materials
QGRW
-
IWY
Real Estate
QGRW
-
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRW vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
QGRW
IWY
QGRW vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRW | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.21 | 1.90 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 2.57 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 1.82 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 5.94 | +4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRW | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 1.90 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.93 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
QGRW vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRW | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -32.68% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -16.63% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | -23.22% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.42% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -4.75% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 5.09% | -1.15% |
Volatility
QGRW vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.30%. This indicates that QGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRW | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 3.30% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 11.57% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 15.48% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 21.47% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 20.97% | +0.11% |
QGRW vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRW vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IWY's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, QGRW and IWY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QGRW has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to IWY (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.55% vs 26.07% for IWY. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.55% return vs 26.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.
IWY has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.
QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.20% for IWY.
QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRW and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer