PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRW vs. IWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRW vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 8.73% return.


QGRW

1D
-0.29%
1M
10.37%
YTD
16.64%
6M
15.80%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
29.55%
5Y*
10Y*

IWY

1D
-0.42%
1M
7.07%
YTD
8.73%
6M
7.99%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
17.12%
10Y*
19.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRW vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
16.64%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.30%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
8.73%18.19%34.89%46.49%-3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRW and IWY is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022

0.98

The correlation between QGRW and IWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

QGRW vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QGRW
IWY

Technology

52.1%
54.9%

Communication Services

17.8%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
11.4%

Industrials

8.0%
4.0%

Healthcare

4.3%
6.6%

Financial Services

4.1%
5.6%

Energy

0.6%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
3.0%

Utilities

0.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Technology

QGRW
52.1%
IWY
54.9%

Communication Services

QGRW
17.8%
IWY
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QGRW
12.4%
IWY
11.4%

Industrials

QGRW
8.0%
IWY
4.0%

Healthcare

QGRW
4.3%
IWY
6.6%

Financial Services

QGRW
4.1%
IWY
5.6%

Energy

QGRW
0.6%
IWY
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

QGRW
0.5%
IWY
3.0%

Utilities

QGRW
0.4%
IWY
1.1%

Basic Materials

QGRW

-

IWY
0.3%

Real Estate

QGRW

-

IWY
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRW vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRW vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QGRWIWYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.21

1.90

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

2.57

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.82

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.01

5.94

+4.07

QGRW vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRW and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QGRWIWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.90

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

0.93

+0.75

Drawdowns

QGRW vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and IWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRWIWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-32.68%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-16.63%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-23.22%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.42%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-4.75%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

5.09%

-1.15%

Volatility

QGRW vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.30%. This indicates that QGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRWIWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.30%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

11.57%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

15.48%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

21.47%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

20.97%

+0.11%

QGRW vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRW vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IWY's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.32%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.07%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, QGRW and IWY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QGRW has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to IWY (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs IWY's -32.68%.

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.55% vs 26.07% for IWY. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.55% return vs 26.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.

IWY has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.

QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.20% for IWY.

QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRW and IWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer