GBIL vs. GSIE
GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index, while GSIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBIL returned 3.32%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for GSIE. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBIL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
GBIL vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBIL achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than GSIE's 6.51% return.
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
GBIL vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 1.42% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 4.91% | 1.05% | -0.08% | 0.79% | 2.31% | 1.78% | 0.69% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 6.51% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 26.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBIL and GSIE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2016 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBIL vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
GBIL
GSIE
GBIL vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBIL | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 16.89 | 1.38 | +15.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 102.89 | 1.99 | +100.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 39.42 | 1.25 | +38.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 196.43 | 1.81 | +194.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,608.66 | 6.87 | +1,601.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBIL | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89 | 1.38 | +15.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.78 | 0.50 | +5.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.87 | 0.52 | +4.35 |
Drawdowns
GBIL vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIL and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBIL | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -34.63% | +33.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -10.76% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.76% | -13.07% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.76% | -29.97% | +29.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.19% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -6.06% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.82% | -2.82% |
Volatility
GBIL vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) is 0.04%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that GBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBIL | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 4.38% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.14% | 11.60% | -11.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23% | 14.15% | -13.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 16.04% | -15.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.47% | 16.75% | -16.28% |
GBIL vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBIL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GBIL vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than GSIE's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.74% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.52% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBIL and GSIE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIE has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to GBIL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBIL dropped -0.76% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 5-year performance, GSIE leads with 8.04% vs 3.32% for GBIL. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 8.04% return vs 3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.52% for GSIE.
GBIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GBIL and 0.25% for GSIE.
GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBIL and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer