GBIL vs. PULS
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS).
GBIL and PULS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBIL is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2016. PULS is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GBIL or PULS.
Correlation
The correlation between GBIL and PULS is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GBIL vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GBIL:
4.27
PULS:
11.53
GBIL:
4.57
PULS:
26.97
GBIL:
3.86
PULS:
6.83
GBIL:
5.07
PULS:
56.18
GBIL:
179.91
PULS:
337.60
GBIL:
0.02%
PULS:
0.02%
GBIL:
0.90%
PULS:
0.49%
GBIL:
-0.76%
PULS:
-5.85%
GBIL:
-0.32%
PULS:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBIL achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 1.16% return.
GBIL
0.61%
0.01%
1.78%
4.62%
2.32%
N/A
PULS
1.16%
0.28%
2.45%
5.64%
3.82%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBIL vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBIL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GBIL vs. PULS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GBIL
PULS
GBIL vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GBIL vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than PULS's 5.35% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 4.39% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.35% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.92% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GBIL vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIL and PULS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GBIL vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) has a higher volatility of 0.35% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that GBIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.