GAVA vs. ENFR
GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAVA is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. GAVA is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
GAVA vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GAVA
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -32.14%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
GAVA vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -34.49% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAVA and ENFR is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAVA vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
GAVA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR
GAVA vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAVA | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAVA vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAVA drawdown since its inception was -38.90%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAVA and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAVA | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.90% | -68.28% | +29.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.90% | -6.12% | -32.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -15.94% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
GAVA vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAVA | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.46% | 14.82% | +39.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.46% | 19.24% | +35.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.46% | 24.68% | +29.78% |
GAVA vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GAVA and ENFR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
GAVA vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
GAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.08% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAVA and ENFR have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA and ENFR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.00% for GAVA.
GAVA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and SS&C.
Find the right allocation for GAVA and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer