GAVA vs. GLNK
GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. GAVA is actively managed, while GLNK is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GAVA charges 0.35%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GLNK.
Performance
GAVA vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
GAVA
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLNK
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -26.29%
- 6M
- -71.32%
- 1Y
- -77.05%
- 3Y*
- -19.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -1.87% |
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAVA and GLNK is 0.97 — these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAVA vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank
GAVA
GLNK
GAVA vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAVA | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.00 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
GAVA vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAVA drawdown since its inception was -15.35%, smaller than the maximum GLNK drawdown of -95.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAVA and GLNK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAVA | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -95.82% | +80.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -88.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.35% | -95.26% | +86.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -54.22% | +45.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 62.75% | — |
Volatility
GAVA vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAVA | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.01% | 123.68% | -63.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.01% | 167.69% | -107.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.01% | 167.69% | -107.68% |
GAVA vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAVA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAVA vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAVA nor GLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.