GAVA vs. ETCG
GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) and ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. GAVA is actively managed, while ETCG is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAVA charges 0.35%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ETCG.
Performance
GAVA vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GAVA
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -31.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCG
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -39.56%
- 6M
- -43.02%
- 1Y
- -52.25%
- 3Y*
- -16.15%
- 5Y*
- -32.95%
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -33.56% |
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -15.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAVA and ETCG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAVA vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank
GAVA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETCG
GAVA vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAVA | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.86 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAVA vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAVA drawdown since its inception was -38.90%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAVA and ETCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAVA | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.90% | -96.59% | +57.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -79.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.03% | -95.63% | +57.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.59% | -82.71% | +69.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 46.02% | — |
Volatility
GAVA vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAVA | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.19% | 62.07% | -7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.19% | 93.49% | -39.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.19% | 115.00% | -60.81% |
GAVA vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAVA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAVA vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAVA nor ETCG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GAVA and ETCG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
GAVA and ETCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAVA and 2.50% for ETCG.
Find the right allocation for GAVA and ETCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer