GAVA vs. GSUI
GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. GAVA is actively managed, while GSUI is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GAVA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
GAVA vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GAVA
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- YTD
- -39.93%
- 6M
- -46.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -12.85% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -16.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAVA and GSUI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAVA vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAVA | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.94 | -0.78 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
GAVA vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAVA drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -60.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAVA and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAVA | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -60.73% | +42.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.61% | -60.73% | +42.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -43.81% | +35.01% |
Volatility
GAVA vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAVA | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.54% | 107.79% | -58.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.54% | 107.79% | -58.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.54% | 107.79% | -58.25% |
GAVA vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAVA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAVA vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAVA nor GSUI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GAVA and GSUI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GAVA.
GAVA and GSUI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAVA and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for GAVA and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer