GAVA vs. ETCO
GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) and ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAVA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ETCO.
Performance
GAVA vs. ETCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GAVA
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- -40.04%
- YTD
- -35.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA vs. ETCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -29.56% |
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -12.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAVA and ETCO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAVA vs. ETCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA) and Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAVA vs. ETCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAVA drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum ETCO drawdown of -59.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAVA and ETCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAVA | ETCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -59.43% | +19.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.30% | -55.45% | +21.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -37.23% | +19.83% |
Volatility
GAVA vs. ETCO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAVA | ETCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.91% | 51.63% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.91% | 51.63% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.91% | 51.63% | +2.28% |
GAVA vs. ETCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAVA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAVA vs. ETCO - Dividend Comparison
GAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 148.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 148.11% | 42.29% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAVA and ETCO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ETCO.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 148.11%, compared with 0.00% for GAVA.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAVA and 0.66% for ETCO.
Find the right allocation for GAVA and ETCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer