GAVA vs. ETCO
GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) and ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GAVA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ETCO.
Performance
GAVA vs. ETCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GAVA
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCO
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -22.34%
- YTD
- -34.48%
- 6M
- -36.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA vs. ETCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -18.74% |
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAVA and ETCO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAVA vs. ETCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA) and Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAVA | ETCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | -1.17 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
GAVA vs. ETCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAVA drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, smaller than the maximum ETCO drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAVA and ETCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAVA | ETCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.10% | -56.81% | +32.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.10% | -55.08% | +30.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -34.54% | +25.25% |
Volatility
GAVA vs. ETCO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAVA | ETCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.58% | 52.38% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 52.38% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 52.38% | -2.80% |
GAVA vs. ETCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAVA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAVA vs. ETCO - Dividend Comparison
GAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 129.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 129.56% | 42.29% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAVA and ETCO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ETCO.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 129.56%, compared with 0.00% for GAVA.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAVA and 0.66% for ETCO.
Find the right allocation for GAVA and ETCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer