GARP vs. TMFS
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and TMFS (Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while TMFS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. GARP is passively managed, while TMFS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 20.74%/yr vs -1.33%/yr for TMFS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TMFS.
Performance
GARP vs. TMFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than TMFS's -3.62% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
TMFS
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- -1.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP vs. TMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 22.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | -3.62% | -1.59% | 15.41% | 25.40% | -33.15% | -2.38% | 49.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and TMFS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between GARP and TMFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GARP vs. TMFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
TMFS
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
TMFS
Communication Services
GARP
TMFS
-
Financial Services
GARP
TMFS
Industrials
GARP
TMFS
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
TMFS
Healthcare
GARP
TMFS
Energy
GARP
TMFS
Utilities
GARP
TMFS
-
Basic Materials
GARP
TMFS
Real Estate
GARP
TMFS
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
TMFS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. TMFS — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
TMFS
GARP vs. TMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | -0.08 | +2.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 0.03 | +3.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.00 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | -0.08 | +3.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | -0.21 | +13.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | -0.08 | +2.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | -0.06 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.33 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. TMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum TMFS drawdown of -48.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and TMFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -48.79% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -15.73% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -27.05% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -45.68% | +15.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -21.91% | +21.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -19.47% | +12.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 5.64% | -2.24% |
Volatility
GARP vs. TMFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) is 4.87%, while Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that GARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 5.43% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 13.97% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 19.59% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 22.93% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 25.52% | -1.62% |
GARP vs. TMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. TMFS - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 2.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and TMFS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFS has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to GARP (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs TMFS's -48.79%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.74% vs -1.33% for TMFS. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.74% return vs -1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFS.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for TMFS.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TMFS is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.85% for TMFS.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and TMFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer