TMFS vs. ITOT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TMFS (Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. TMFS is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMFS returned -1.70%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TMFS charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.

Performance

TMFS vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 10.57% return.

TMFS

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -1.83%
• 6M: 0.91%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 1Y: 3.12%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: -1.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.16%

ITOT

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 8.89%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 1Y: 21.81%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 14.60%
• ALL TIME*: 10.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	$209.16M	$238.83M	$306.83M
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF	$105.61K	$113.15K	$201.92K

TMFS vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF	1.73%	-1.59%	15.41%	25.40%	-33.15%	-2.38%	58.52%	40.19%	-6.14%
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	10.57%	17.00%	23.80%	26.12%	-19.47%	25.68%	20.71%	30.67%	-4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFS and ITOT is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018	0.80

The correlation between TMFS and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TMFS vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMFS	ITOT
Technology	24.5%	36.4%
Industrials	22.4%	9.9%
Healthcare	22.2%	9.5%
Financial Services	13.8%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	9.5%
Real Estate	5.2%	2.3%
Energy	2.4%	3.1%
Basic Materials	2.1%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	4.3%
Communication Services	-	9.1%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

TMFS vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFS

TMFS Risk / Return Rank: 13
TMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ITOT

ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 67
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFS vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFS	ITOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	1.51	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	2.10	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.27	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	2.23	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.30	9.56	-9.27

TMFS vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFS and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMFS vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and ITOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFS	ITOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.79%	-55.20%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.73%	-8.90%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.05%	-19.44%	-7.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.68%	-25.36%	-20.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.58%	-1.34%	-16.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.44%	-6.93%	-12.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.70%	2.07%	+3.63%

Volatility

TMFS vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.52%. This indicates that TMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFS	ITOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	3.52%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	10.27%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.75%	13.14%	+6.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.97%	17.47%	+5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.38%	18.27%	+7.11%

TMFS vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFS vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	1.01%	1.11%	1.23%	1.47%	1.66%	1.18%	1.41%	1.88%	2.14%	1.69%	1.83%	2.01%
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.34%	2.37%	5.57%	2.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFS and ITOT in my portfolio?

TMFS and ITOT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFS or ITOT?

TMFS has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to ITOT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFS dropped -48.79% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

Which ETF is better, TMFS or ITOT?

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 11.75% vs -1.70% for TMFS. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFS or ITOT?

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 11.75% return vs -1.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFS or ITOT?

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFS or ITOT?

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for TMFS.

What is the main difference between TMFS and ITOT?

TMFS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFS and 0.03% for ITOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.