GARA vs. MOTO
GARA (Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF) and MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARA is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while MOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson. Both are actively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GARA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MOTO.
Performance
GARA vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARA achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly lower than MOTO's 15.61% return.
GARA
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MOTO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $890.80 | $714.64 | $1.92K | |
| $14.87K | $16.20K | $15.49K |
GARA vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 11.16% | 1.34% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 15.61% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARA and MOTO is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARA vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank
GARA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MOTO
GARA vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARA | MOTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARA vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARA drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum MOTO drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARA and MOTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARA | MOTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -38.24% | +30.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -12.09% | +10.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -9.94% | +8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.25% | — |
Volatility
GARA vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARA | MOTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 24.57% | -11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 24.24% | -11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 26.51% | -13.85% |
GARA vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTO's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARA vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison
GARA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than MOTO's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARA and MOTO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GARA is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GARA is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.
GARA has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.91% for MOTO.
GARA is categorized as Global Equity Income, while MOTO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GARA and 0.68% for MOTO.
Find the right allocation for GARA and MOTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer