PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYC vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 25.16% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's 13.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FYC has outperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 15.10%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


FYC

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.13%
YTD
25.16%
6M
22.15%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
28.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
15.10%

ISCG

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.35%
YTD
13.97%
6M
11.01%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYC vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
25.16%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
13.97%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and ISCG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.90

The correlation between FYC and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYC vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYC
ISCG

Healthcare

25.3%
16.8%

Industrials

18.7%
24.4%

Technology

17.5%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.8%

Financial Services

8.9%
9.9%

Real Estate

5.7%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.7%

Energy

2.2%
3.3%

Utilities

1.6%
1.1%

Healthcare

FYC
25.3%
ISCG
16.8%

Industrials

FYC
18.7%
ISCG
24.4%

Technology

FYC
17.5%
ISCG
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FYC
9.5%
ISCG
8.8%

Financial Services

FYC
8.9%
ISCG
9.9%

Real Estate

FYC
5.7%
ISCG
4.8%

Communication Services

FYC
3.7%
ISCG
2.8%

Basic Materials

FYC
3.7%
ISCG
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

FYC
3.2%
ISCG
2.7%

Energy

FYC
2.2%
ISCG
3.3%

Utilities

FYC
1.6%
ISCG
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYC vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYC vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYCISCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

2.67

+2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.70

10.16

+9.54

FYC vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYC vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYCISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-57.72%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.43%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-26.71%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-37.80%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-41.48%

-6.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.18%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-11.60%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.00%

-0.11%

Volatility

FYC vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 5.89%. This indicates that FYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYCISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

5.89%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

13.68%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

18.61%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

23.03%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

23.17%

+1.44%

FYC vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYC vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than ISCG's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.06%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.59%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FYC and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYC has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to ISCG (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 15.10% vs 11.89% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

ISCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.06% for FYC.

FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.06% for ISCG.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYC and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer