FYC vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
FYC and VB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FYC is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2011. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both FYC and VB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FYC or VB.
Correlation
The correlation between FYC and VB is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FYC vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FYC:
0.43
VB:
0.12
FYC:
0.75
VB:
0.31
FYC:
1.09
VB:
1.04
FYC:
0.37
VB:
0.09
FYC:
1.11
VB:
0.29
FYC:
9.26%
VB:
8.02%
FYC:
24.85%
VB:
22.44%
FYC:
-47.85%
VB:
-59.57%
FYC:
-14.96%
VB:
-13.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly lower than VB's -6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FYC has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 9.24%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
FYC
-7.21%
17.77%
-11.40%
10.58%
13.89%
9.24%
VB
-6.55%
15.43%
-10.30%
2.76%
12.26%
7.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FYC vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FYC vs. VB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FYC
VB
FYC vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FYC vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than VB's 1.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.78% | 0.72% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.12% | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.03% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.51% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
FYC vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FYC vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) is 10.65%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 11.45%. This indicates that FYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.