PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYC vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly higher than VBK's 12.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FYC has outperformed VBK with an annualized return of 14.06%, while VBK has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.


FYC

1D
-0.59%
1M
-3.95%
6M
18.84%
YTD
23.54%
1Y
52.40%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
14.06%
ALL TIME*
12.46%

VBK

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.86%
6M
9.06%
YTD
12.94%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
10.90%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.77M$9.10M$7.44M
$67.40M$71.27M$83.02M

FYC vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
23.54%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.94%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and VBK is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.91

The correlation between FYC and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYC vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYC
VBK

Healthcare

27.2%
17.9%

Industrials

17.6%
23.4%

Technology

17.5%
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
8.9%

Financial Services

8.9%
5.7%

Real Estate

5.4%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
2.0%

Energy

2.1%
3.4%

Utilities

1.5%
1.1%

Healthcare

FYC
27.2%
VBK
17.9%

Industrials

FYC
17.6%
VBK
23.4%

Technology

FYC
17.5%
VBK
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FYC
9.4%
VBK
8.9%

Financial Services

FYC
8.9%
VBK
5.7%

Real Estate

FYC
5.4%
VBK
3.7%

Communication Services

FYC
3.8%
VBK
3.6%

Basic Materials

FYC
3.6%
VBK
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

FYC
2.9%
VBK
2.0%

Energy

FYC
2.1%
VBK
3.4%

Utilities

FYC
1.5%
VBK
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYC vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FYC vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYCVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

1.86

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.97

6.29

+8.68

FYC vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYC vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYCVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-58.68%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.44%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-27.54%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-38.39%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-38.70%

-9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.85%

-6.90%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-10.10%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.37%

-0.11%

Volatility

FYC vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) have volatilities of 5.15% and 5.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYCVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

5.16%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.16%

15.93%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.77%

20.39%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.67%

23.65%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.62%

22.91%

+1.71%

FYC vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYC vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than VBK's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.17%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FYC and VBK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FYC (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 14.06% vs 10.90% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

VBK has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.17% for FYC.

FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.05% for VBK.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYC and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer