PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXZ vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXZ vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 29.62% return, which is significantly higher than XME's 24.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 11.67%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 20.21% annualized return.


FXZ

1D
-0.40%
1M
5.70%
YTD
29.62%
6M
33.34%
1Y
53.31%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
11.67%

XME

1D
-3.24%
1M
9.89%
YTD
24.13%
6M
29.19%
1Y
103.84%
3Y*
40.26%
5Y*
23.59%
10Y*
20.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXZ vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
29.62%16.25%-16.31%16.27%-0.92%30.84%22.52%21.52%-22.62%23.72%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
24.13%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FXZ and XME is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.81

The correlation between FXZ and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXZ vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXZ
XME

Basic Materials

75.7%
75.3%

Industrials

20.4%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.8%

Energy

-

23.4%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

FXZ
75.7%
XME
75.3%

Industrials

FXZ
20.4%
XME
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FXZ
3.9%
XME

-

Communication Services

FXZ

-

XME

-

Consumer Defensive

FXZ

-

XME
0.8%

Energy

FXZ

-

XME
23.4%

Financial Services

FXZ

-

XME

-

Healthcare

FXZ

-

XME

-

Real Estate

FXZ

-

XME

-

Technology

FXZ

-

XME
2.2%

Utilities

FXZ

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXZ vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXZ
FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXZ vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXZXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

4.62

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.80

11.75

+4.05

FXZ vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXZ and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXZXMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

3.02

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.73

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.62

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.18

+0.17

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXZXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.46%

-85.89%

+20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-22.60%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.99%

-30.47%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.99%

-37.27%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.41%

-61.69%

+12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-3.24%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.36%

-44.14%

+32.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

8.87%

-5.49%

Volatility

FXZ vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) is 7.04%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 12.42%. This indicates that FXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXZXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

12.42%

-5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.40%

26.73%

-10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.87%

34.65%

-12.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

32.54%

-8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

32.84%

-7.97%

FXZ vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXZ vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than XME's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
1.38%1.74%1.81%1.97%1.56%1.11%1.51%1.58%1.38%1.01%1.19%1.26%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.30%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXZ and XME have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to FXZ (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 20.21% vs 11.67% for FXZ. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 20.21% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.

FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.30% for XME.

FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXZ and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer