FXZ vs. WOOD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) and WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) are both Materials funds - FXZ tracks the StrataQuant Materials Index while WOOD tracks the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXZ returned 11.67%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for WOOD. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXZ charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for WOOD.

Performance

FXZ vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 29.62% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD's -6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has outperformed WOOD with an annualized return of 11.67%, while WOOD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.

FXZ

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 29.62%
• 6M: 33.34%
• 1Y: 53.31%
• 3Y*: 13.07%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

WOOD

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -6.95%
• 6M: -3.23%
• 1Y: -6.85%
• 3Y*: -0.20%
• 5Y*: -3.93%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXZ vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	29.62%	16.25%	-16.31%	16.27%	-0.92%	30.84%	22.52%	21.52%	-22.62%	23.72%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	-6.95%	-3.27%	-4.21%	13.84%	-19.39%	17.03%	20.36%	19.75%	-17.73%	34.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FXZ and WOOD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.76

The correlation between FXZ and WOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXZ vs. WOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXZ	WOOD
Basic Materials	75.7%	63.6%
Industrials	20.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	23.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	12.9%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FXZ vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXZ

FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 74
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

WOOD

WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 5
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXZ vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXZ	WOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	-0.37	+2.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	-0.40	+3.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.95	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	-0.32	+4.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.80	-0.74	+16.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXZ vs. WOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the WOOD Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXZ and WOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXZ	WOOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	-0.37	+2.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	-0.20	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.24	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.15	+0.20

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, roughly equal to the maximum WOOD drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and WOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXZ	WOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.46%	-63.25%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.75%	-21.64%	+8.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.99%	-22.79%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.99%	-30.71%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.41%	-50.20%	+0.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-24.31%	+23.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.36%	-14.76%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	9.27%	-5.89%

Volatility

FXZ vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) at 5.70%. This indicates that FXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXZ	WOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	5.70%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.40%	13.96%	+2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.87%	18.70%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.13%	19.72%	+4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.87%	21.87%	+3.00%

FXZ vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXZ vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than WOOD's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	1.38%	1.74%	1.81%	1.97%	1.56%	1.11%	1.51%	1.58%	1.38%	1.01%	1.19%	1.26%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	2.69%	2.51%	2.09%	1.64%	2.26%	1.24%	0.98%	1.85%	2.82%	1.19%	1.65%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXZ and WOOD in my portfolio?

FXZ and WOOD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXZ or WOOD?

FXZ has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to WOOD (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs WOOD's -63.25%.

Which ETF is better, FXZ or WOOD?

On 10-year performance, FXZ leads with 11.67% vs 5.20% for WOOD. On fees, WOOD is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXZ or WOOD?

Over the 10-year period, FXZ has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXZ or WOOD?

WOOD is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXZ or WOOD?

WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.38% for FXZ.

What is the main difference between FXZ and WOOD?

FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.46% for WOOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.