WOOD vs. GLD

In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -4.70% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 27.23% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 4.74%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WOOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOOD and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.23%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) at 8.17%. This indicates that WOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.