WOOD vs. SPY
WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOOD returned 5.69%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for SPY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WOOD charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
WOOD vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 5.69%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.22% annualized return.
WOOD
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- -7.46%
- 3Y*
- -0.50%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 22.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
WOOD vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -5.06% | -3.27% | -4.21% | 13.84% | -19.39% | 17.03% | 20.36% | 19.75% | -17.73% | 34.49% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.30% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOOD and SPY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WOOD and SPY has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WOOD vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WOOD
SPY
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
WOOD
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
WOOD
SPY
Real Estate
WOOD
SPY
Communication Services
WOOD
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
WOOD
-
SPY
Energy
WOOD
-
SPY
Financial Services
WOOD
-
SPY
Healthcare
WOOD
-
SPY
Industrials
WOOD
-
SPY
Technology
WOOD
-
SPY
Utilities
WOOD
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOOD vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
WOOD
SPY
WOOD vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOOD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.48 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 10.83 | -11.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOOD vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOOD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.25% | -55.19% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -8.88% | -12.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -18.76% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | -24.50% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -33.72% | -16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.77% | -0.35% | -22.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -9.03% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.88% | 2.03% | +8.85% |
Volatility
WOOD vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.52%. This indicates that WOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOOD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.52% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 9.98% | +4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 12.55% | +6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 17.16% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 17.92% | +3.78% |
WOOD vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOOD vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.49% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WOOD and SPY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WOOD has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to SPY (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.22% vs 5.69% for WOOD. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.
WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
WOOD is categorized as Materials, while SPY is S&P 500. WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOOD and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer