WOOD vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOOD returned 6.12%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WOOD charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

WOOD vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 6.12%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.

WOOD

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: -5.94%
• 6M: -4.22%
• 1Y: -5.09%
• 3Y*: 0.46%
• 5Y*: -2.94%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

QQQ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 20.41%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 40.91%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOOD vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	-5.94%	-3.27%	-4.21%	13.84%	-19.39%	17.03%	20.36%	19.75%	-17.73%	34.49%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	20.41%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WOOD and QQQ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between WOOD and QQQ has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WOOD vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WOOD	QQQ
Basic Materials	62.4%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	24.6%	11.4%
Real Estate	13.0%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Technology	-	58.7%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

WOOD vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOOD

WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 6
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOOD vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WOOD	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	2.33	-2.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	3.03	-3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.41	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	3.44	-3.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	12.79	-13.29

WOOD vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOOD and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WOOD vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WOOD	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.25%	-82.97%	+19.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.64%	-11.96%	-9.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-22.77%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.71%	-35.12%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.20%	-35.12%	-15.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.49%	-0.99%	-22.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	-32.73%	+17.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.07%	3.21%	+6.86%

Volatility

WOOD vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is 4.88%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that WOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WOOD	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	8.47%	-3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.16%	14.20%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.88%	17.67%	+1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	22.64%	-2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.85%	22.43%	-0.58%

WOOD vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

WOOD vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.49%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	2.51%	2.51%	2.09%	1.64%	2.26%	1.24%	0.98%	1.85%	2.82%	1.19%	1.65%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WOOD and QQQ in my portfolio?

WOOD and QQQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WOOD or QQQ?

QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to WOOD (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, WOOD or QQQ?

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 6.12% for WOOD. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WOOD or QQQ?

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WOOD or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WOOD or QQQ?

WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.

What is the main difference between WOOD and QQQ?

WOOD is categorized as Materials, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.