FXZ vs. RSPM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) and RSPM (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - FXZ tracks the StrataQuant Materials Index while RSPM tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXZ returned 10.25%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for RSPM. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FXZ charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPM.

Performance

FXZ vs. RSPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than RSPM's 15.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXZ having a 10.25% annualized return and RSPM not far ahead at 10.47%.

FXZ

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -2.68%
• 6M: 7.26%
• YTD: 18.92%
• 1Y: 38.67%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: 10.25%
• ALL TIME*: 8.86%

RSPM

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 5.52%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 1Y: 24.72%
• 3Y*: 6.92%
• 5Y*: 5.37%
• 10Y*: 10.47%
• ALL TIME*: 9.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	$3.44M	$3.68M	$4.56M
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF	$1.60M	$1.26M	$779.50K

FXZ vs. RSPM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	18.92%	16.25%	-16.31%	16.27%	-0.92%	30.84%	22.52%	21.52%	-22.62%	23.72%
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF	15.29%	6.90%	-1.30%	8.32%	-9.95%	31.21%	22.77%	25.11%	-14.75%	25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FXZ and RSPM is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007	0.88

The correlation between FXZ and RSPM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXZ vs. RSPM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXZ	RSPM
Basic Materials	72.3%	74.7%
Industrials	23.4%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	25.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FXZ vs. RSPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXZ

FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

RSPM

RSPM Risk / Return Rank: 49
RSPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RSPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RSPM Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RSPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RSPM Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXZ vs. RSPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXZ	RSPM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.19	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	1.80	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	1.81	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	5.41	+3.24

FXZ vs. RSPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the RSPM Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXZ and RSPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. RSPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, which is greater than RSPM's maximum drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and RSPM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXZ	RSPM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.46%	-61.18%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.75%	-12.32%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.99%	-27.19%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.99%	-27.19%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.41%	-39.84%	-9.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.42%	-4.53%	-4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.31%	-8.76%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	4.12%	+0.01%

Volatility

FXZ vs. RSPM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) at 5.87%. This indicates that FXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXZ	RSPM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	5.87%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	14.48%	+3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.84%	18.80%	+4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.15%	20.24%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.94%	21.90%	+3.04%

FXZ vs. RSPM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXZ vs. RSPM - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than RSPM's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	1.42%	1.74%	1.81%	1.97%	1.56%	1.11%	1.51%	1.58%	1.38%	1.01%	1.19%	1.26%
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF	1.77%	2.06%	2.04%	2.05%	2.19%	1.43%	1.57%	1.81%	1.83%	1.50%	1.28%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXZ and RSPM in my portfolio?

FXZ and RSPM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXZ or RSPM?

FXZ has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to RSPM (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs RSPM's -61.18%.

Which ETF is better, FXZ or RSPM?

On 10-year performance, RSPM leads with 10.47% vs 10.25% for FXZ. On fees, RSPM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPM has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXZ or RSPM?

Over the 10-year period, RSPM has performed better with a 10.47% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXZ or RSPM?

RSPM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXZ or RSPM?

RSPM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.42% for FXZ.

What is the main difference between FXZ and RSPM?

FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while RSPM tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.40% for RSPM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.