FXN vs. XES
FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) and XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - FXN tracks the StrataQuant Energy Index while XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXN returned 5.82%/yr vs -3.65%/yr for XES. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXN charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XES.
Performance
FXN vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 25.36% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 39.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FXN has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 5.82%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -3.65% annualized return.
FXN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- 25.36%
- 6M
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 36.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
XES
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- 39.22%
- 6M
- 40.00%
- 1Y
- 79.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.65%
FXN vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 25.36% | 3.39% | 0.27% | 0.97% | 46.92% | 51.79% | -19.91% | -6.76% | -24.79% | -5.02% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 39.22% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXN and XES is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FXN and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXN vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXN
XES
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
FXN
XES
Technology
FXN
XES
-
Basic Materials
FXN
-
XES
-
Communication Services
FXN
-
XES
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXN
-
XES
-
Consumer Defensive
FXN
-
XES
-
Financial Services
FXN
-
XES
-
Healthcare
FXN
-
XES
-
Industrials
FXN
-
XES
Real Estate
FXN
-
XES
-
Utilities
FXN
-
XES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXN vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
FXN
XES
FXN vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXN | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 5.32 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 18.76 | -10.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXN vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and XES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXN | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -95.65% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -15.03% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.69% | -45.95% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | -45.95% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.63% | -91.23% | +10.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -73.11% | +61.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.90% | -54.40% | +16.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 4.25% | +0.32% |
Volatility
FXN vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) is 7.38%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that FXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXN | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 10.30% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | 20.80% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 31.19% | -7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.95% | 39.02% | -10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.94% | 44.96% | -10.02% |
FXN vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXN vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than XES's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1.91% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.09% | 2.28% | 0.87% | 4.71% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.05% | 2.36% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.15% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXN and XES have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to FXN (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs XES's -95.65%.
On 10-year performance, FXN leads with 5.82% vs -3.65% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXN has been the lower-risk option at 7.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXN has performed better with a 5.82% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.
FXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.15% for XES.
FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.35% for XES.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXN and XES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer