FXN vs. FENY
FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) and FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - FXN tracks the StrataQuant Energy Index while FENY tracks the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXN returned 5.81%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for FENY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXN charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FENY.
Performance
FXN vs. FENY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly higher than FENY's 22.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FXN has underperformed FENY with an annualized return of 5.81%, while FENY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.68% annualized return.
FXN
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 25.24%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 32.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
FENY
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- 22.78%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
FXN vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 25.24% | 3.39% | 0.27% | 0.97% | 46.92% | 51.79% | -19.91% | -6.76% | -24.79% | -5.02% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 22.78% | 7.27% | 6.62% | -0.04% | 62.94% | 55.62% | -33.15% | 9.11% | -19.99% | -2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXN and FENY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FXN and FENY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXN vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXN
FENY
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
FXN
FENY
Technology
FXN
FENY
-
Basic Materials
FXN
-
FENY
Communication Services
FXN
-
FENY
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXN
-
FENY
-
Consumer Defensive
FXN
-
FENY
-
Financial Services
FXN
-
FENY
-
Healthcare
FXN
-
FENY
-
Industrials
FXN
-
FENY
Real Estate
FXN
-
FENY
-
Utilities
FXN
-
FENY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXN vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank
FXN
FENY
FXN vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXN | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.89 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 5.90 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXN vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than FENY's maximum drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and FENY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXN | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -74.35% | -13.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -14.15% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.69% | -21.47% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | -26.64% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.63% | -69.07% | -11.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -13.08% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.91% | -23.07% | -14.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 4.56% | -0.01% |
Volatility
FXN vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) at 7.02%. This indicates that FXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FENY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXN | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 7.02% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 16.66% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 20.85% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.95% | 26.43% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.98% | 29.83% | +5.15% |
FXN vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXN vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison
FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than FENY's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1.91% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.09% | 2.28% | 0.87% | 4.71% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.05% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FXN and FENY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FXN has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to FENY (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs FENY's -74.35%.
On 10-year performance, FENY leads with 8.68% vs 5.81% for FXN. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FENY has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FENY has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.91% for FXN.
FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.08% for FENY.
FXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXN and FENY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer