FXN vs. TAN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) and TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXN is a Energy Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Energy Index, while TAN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXN returned 5.81%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for TAN. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXN charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TAN.

Performance

FXN vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FXN having a 25.24% return and TAN slightly lower at 24.41%. Over the past 10 years, FXN has underperformed TAN with an annualized return of 5.81%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.

FXN

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: -7.93%
• YTD: 25.24%
• 6M: 25.77%
• 1Y: 32.05%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: 5.81%

TAN

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -7.34%
• YTD: 24.41%
• 6M: 18.89%
• 1Y: 90.67%
• 3Y*: -3.33%
• 5Y*: -6.08%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXN vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund	25.24%	3.39%	0.27%	0.97%	46.92%	51.79%	-19.91%	-6.76%	-24.79%	-5.02%
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	24.41%	48.31%	-37.61%	-26.79%	-5.24%	-25.10%	233.96%	66.53%	-25.67%	54.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FXN and TAN is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2008	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between FXN and TAN has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXN vs. TAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXN	TAN
Energy	92.2%	57.3%
Technology	7.8%	65.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	2.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	29.2%

Return for Risk

FXN vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXN

FXN Risk / Return Rank: 41
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

TAN

TAN Risk / Return Rank: 74
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXN vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXN	TAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.38	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	3.03	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.36	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	4.35	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.12	13.98	-6.86

FXN vs. TAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the TAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXN and TAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXN vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and TAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXN	TAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.39%	-95.29%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.99%	-20.94%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.69%	-64.40%	+32.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.69%	-73.95%	+42.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.63%	-78.53%	-2.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.35%	-71.94%	+60.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.91%	-78.47%	+40.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	6.51%	-1.96%

Volatility

FXN vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) is 7.42%, while Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a volatility of 16.46%. This indicates that FXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXN	TAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.42%	16.46%	-9.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.33%	28.51%	-11.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.90%	38.32%	-14.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.95%	40.11%	-11.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.98%	38.17%	-3.19%

FXN vs. TAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than TAN's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXN vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund	1.91%	2.53%	2.50%	3.09%	2.28%	0.87%	4.71%	1.47%	1.43%	1.17%	1.05%	2.36%
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.30%	0.69%	1.77%	5.04%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXN and TAN in my portfolio?

FXN and TAN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXN or TAN?

TAN has higher volatility (16.46%) compared to FXN (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs TAN's -95.29%.

Which ETF is better, FXN or TAN?

On 10-year performance, TAN leads with 12.83% vs 5.81% for FXN. On fees, FXN is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FXN has been the lower-risk option at 7.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXN or TAN?

Over the 10-year period, TAN has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXN or TAN?

FXN is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXN or TAN?

FXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for TAN.

What is the main difference between FXN and TAN?

FXN is categorized as Energy Equities, while TAN is Alternative Energy Equities. FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while TAN tracks MAC Global Solar Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.69% for TAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.