FWAFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
FWAFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
FWAFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWAFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A | -6.91% | 15.83% | 27.27% | 24.62% | -25.96% | 18.13% | 30.57% | 28.58% | -4.80% | 29.15% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWAFX achieves a -6.91% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FWAFX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 12.14%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
FWAFX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -10.40%
- YTD
- -6.91%
- 6M
- -5.51%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWAFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWAFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWAFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
FWAFX
FGIAX
FWAFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.75 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.26 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.61 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 12.12 | -7.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.75 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.80 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.42 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWAFX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWAFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
FWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.43%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A | 12.43% | 11.57% | 14.70% | 0.66% | 6.00% | 12.73% | 8.01% | 4.71% | 9.43% | 6.66% | 0.88% | 3.72% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
FWAFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWAFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -49.35% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -8.29% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | -21.08% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -38.02% | +4.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -3.78% | -7.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -7.22% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.78% | +1.23% |
Volatility
FWAFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FWAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 4.05% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 7.09% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 12.28% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 13.08% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 15.17% | +3.45% |