FWAFX vs. FGTIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FWAFX (Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A) and FGTIX (Franklin Growth Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - FWAFX is a Global Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FGTIX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, FWAFX returned 14.70%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for FGTIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWAFX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FGTIX.

Performance

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWAFX achieves a 19.33% return, which is significantly higher than FGTIX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FWAFX has outperformed FGTIX with an annualized return of 14.70%, while FGTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.38% annualized return.

FWAFX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: 19.33%
• 6M: 19.41%
• 1Y: 39.82%
• 3Y*: 24.68%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

FGTIX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 24.14%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 10.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A	19.33%	15.83%	27.27%	24.62%	-25.96%	18.13%	30.57%	28.58%	-4.80%	29.15%
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund	9.75%	17.82%	15.13%	17.62%	-17.12%	16.39%	14.54%	21.85%	-6.45%	18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FWAFX and FGTIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009	0.94

The correlation between FWAFX and FGTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FWAFX vs. FGTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWAFX

FWAFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FWAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FWAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FWAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FWAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FWAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FGTIX

FGTIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FGTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FGTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FGTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FGTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FGTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWAFX	FGTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.42	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.38	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.45	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	3.02	+0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.99	13.78	+1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FGTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWAFX and FGTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWAFX	FGTIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.42	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.61	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.75	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.54	+0.23

Drawdowns

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum FGTIX drawdown of -46.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWAFX and FGTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWAFX	FGTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.90%	-46.40%	+12.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-8.16%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.67%	-14.22%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.90%	-31.56%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	-31.56%	-2.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	0.00%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-10.16%	+3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	1.79%	+0.93%

Volatility

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) at 2.80%. This indicates that FWAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWAFX	FGTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	2.80%	+3.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.69%	8.21%	+5.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	10.25%	+7.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.92%	15.01%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.82%	13.87%	+4.95%

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWAFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FGTIX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWAFX vs. FGTIX - Dividend Comparison

FWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than FGTIX's 8.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund	8.25%	8.98%	2.27%	3.28%	4.93%	14.27%	5.11%	11.14%	9.45%	6.22%	2.70%	6.36%
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A	9.69%	11.57%	14.70%	0.66%	6.00%	12.73%	8.01%	4.71%	9.43%	6.66%	0.88%	3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWAFX and FGTIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FWAFX and FGTIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FWAFX or FGTIX?

FWAFX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to FGTIX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWAFX dropped -33.90% vs FGTIX's -46.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.