FWAFX vs. FEYAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A (FEYAX).
FWAFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009. FEYAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2006.
Performance
FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A | -6.91% | 15.83% | 27.27% | 24.62% | -25.96% | 18.13% | 30.57% | 28.58% | -4.80% | 29.15% |
FEYAX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A | -3.78% | 20.45% | 12.32% | 18.67% | -18.82% | 16.79% | 18.99% | 25.83% | -9.46% | 20.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWAFX achieves a -6.91% return, which is significantly lower than FEYAX's -3.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FWAFX has outperformed FEYAX with an annualized return of 12.14%, while FEYAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.
FWAFX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -10.40%
- YTD
- -6.91%
- 6M
- -5.51%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
FEYAX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWAFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FEYAX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWAFX vs. FEYAX — Risk / Return Rank
FWAFX
FEYAX
FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A (FEYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWAFX | FEYAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.13 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.63 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 6.46 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWAFX | FEYAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.13 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWAFX and FEYAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Dividend Comparison
FWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.43%, more than FEYAX's 5.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A | 12.43% | 11.57% | 14.70% | 0.66% | 6.00% | 12.73% | 8.01% | 4.71% | 9.43% | 6.66% | 0.88% | 3.72% |
FEYAX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A | 5.56% | 5.35% | 3.19% | 1.10% | 4.85% | 2.95% | 1.75% | 5.30% | 5.34% | 2.33% | 0.29% | 4.55% |
Drawdowns
FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum FEYAX drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWAFX and FEYAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWAFX | FEYAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -52.90% | +19.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -10.76% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | -26.20% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -31.01% | -2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -9.37% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -7.34% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.41% | +0.60% |
Volatility
FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A (FEYAX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FWAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWAFX | FEYAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 5.38% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 9.25% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 15.40% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 14.50% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 15.17% | +3.45% |