PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWAFX vs. FEYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A (FEYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWAFX achieves a 19.33% return, which is significantly higher than FEYAX's 13.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FWAFX has outperformed FEYAX with an annualized return of 14.70%, while FEYAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.


FWAFX

1D
0.19%
1M
6.47%
YTD
19.33%
6M
19.41%
1Y
39.82%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
14.70%

FEYAX

1D
0.39%
1M
4.35%
YTD
13.40%
6M
14.96%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWAFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A
19.33%15.83%27.27%24.62%-25.96%18.13%30.57%28.58%-4.80%29.15%
FEYAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A
13.40%20.45%12.32%18.67%-18.82%16.79%18.99%25.83%-9.46%20.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FWAFX and FEYAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

0.96

The correlation between FWAFX and FEYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWAFX vs. FEYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWAFX
FWAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FWAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FWAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FEYAX
FEYAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FEYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FEYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A (FEYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWAFXFEYAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

2.55

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

3.50

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.29

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.99

14.61

+0.37

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FEYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWAFX and FEYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWAFXFEYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.55

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.64

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.75

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.50

+0.27

Drawdowns

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum FEYAX drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWAFX and FEYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWAFXFEYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-52.90%

+19.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-9.37%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.67%

-15.40%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.90%

-26.20%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-31.01%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-7.29%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.11%

+0.61%

Volatility

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A (FEYAX) at 3.81%. This indicates that FWAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWAFXFEYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

3.81%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

9.92%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

12.26%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

14.65%

+4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

15.27%

+3.55%

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWAFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FEYAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWAFX vs. FEYAX - Dividend Comparison

FWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than FEYAX's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEYAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class A
4.72%5.35%3.19%1.10%4.85%2.95%1.75%5.30%5.34%2.33%0.29%4.55%
FWAFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A
9.69%11.57%14.70%0.66%6.00%12.73%8.01%4.71%9.43%6.66%0.88%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FWAFX and FEYAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWAFX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to FEYAX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWAFX dropped -33.90% vs FEYAX's -52.90%.

FEYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWAFX and FEYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer