FVD vs. RDVY
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVD returned 8.75%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for RDVY. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.
Performance
FVD vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 8.75%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.
FVD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.74%
RDVY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 16.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.15M | $21.63M | $33.04M | |
| $77.65M | $79.19M | $83.63M |
FVD vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 10.07% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -3.49% | 12.51% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 17.25% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and RDVY is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FVD and RDVY has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FVD vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
RDVY
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
FVD
RDVY
Utilities
FVD
RDVY
Industrials
FVD
RDVY
Consumer Defensive
FVD
RDVY
Healthcare
FVD
RDVY
Real Estate
FVD
RDVY
-
Technology
FVD
RDVY
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
RDVY
Energy
FVD
RDVY
Communication Services
FVD
RDVY
Basic Materials
FVD
RDVY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
RDVY
FVD vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 3.25 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 13.63 | -8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -40.60% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -9.04% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -19.11% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | -25.32% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | -40.60% | +5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | 0.00% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -4.95% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.15% | +0.68% |
Volatility
FVD vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.53% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 11.46% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 14.65% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 18.92% | -6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 21.03% | -5.56% |
FVD vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.83% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and RDVY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVD has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 8.75% for FVD. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.
FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.47% for RDVY.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer