FVD vs. DXUV
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FVD is passively managed, while DXUV is actively managed. Over the past year, FVD returned 6.84% vs 27.35% for DXUV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DXUV.
Performance
FVD vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than DXUV's 10.92% return.
FVD
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
DXUV
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FVD vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.21% | 8.16% | -0.92% |
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 10.92% | 14.34% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and DXUV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FVD and DXUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVD vs. DXUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
DXUV
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FVD
DXUV
Utilities
FVD
DXUV
Industrials
FVD
DXUV
Consumer Defensive
FVD
DXUV
Real Estate
FVD
DXUV
Healthcare
FVD
DXUV
Technology
FVD
DXUV
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
DXUV
Energy
FVD
DXUV
Communication Services
FVD
DXUV
Basic Materials
FVD
DXUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
DXUV
FVD vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVD | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.38 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 3.22 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 13.10 | -10.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVD | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 2.17 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.05 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
FVD vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than DXUV's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and DXUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -21.08% | -29.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -8.53% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -0.66% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.08% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.09% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FVD vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 2.62%, while Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.98% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | 8.99% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 12.72% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 17.31% | -4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 17.31% | -1.87% |
FVD vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DXUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than DXUV's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.31% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and DXUV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXUV has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs DXUV's -21.08%.
On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 27.35% vs 6.84% for FVD. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 27.35% return vs 6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.25% for DXUV.
DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and DXUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer