DXUV vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. DXUV is actively managed, while AUSF is passively managed. Over the past year, DXUV returned 27.33% vs 14.20% for AUSF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

DXUV vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXUV achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 5.74% return.

DXUV

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 27.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUSF

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 6M: 4.91%
• 1Y: 14.20%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 13.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXUV vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	10.98%	14.34%	5.03%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	5.74%	13.69%	2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DXUV and AUSF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	0.75

The correlation between DXUV and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DXUV vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DXUV	AUSF
Technology	26.7%	15.3%
Financial Services	15.6%	18.4%
Industrials	14.4%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.4%	11.4%
Communication Services	7.7%	8.6%
Energy	6.4%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	7.8%
Basic Materials	3.7%	2.6%
Utilities	0.5%	4.4%
Real Estate	0.3%	4.6%

Return for Risk

DXUV vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXUV

DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 67
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 42
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXUV vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DXUV	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.39	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.01	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.24	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	2.44	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	6.97	+6.05

DXUV vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXUV and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DXUV vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXUV drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, smaller than the maximum AUSF drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXUV and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXUV	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.08%	-44.25%	+23.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-5.84%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-3.24%	+2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-4.20%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.04%	+0.06%

Volatility

DXUV vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.91%. This indicates that DXUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXUV	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	2.91%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	6.91%	+2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.01%	10.27%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	13.62%	+3.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	19.03%	-1.74%

DXUV vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DXUV vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

DXUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than AUSF's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.78%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	0.96%	1.01%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DXUV and AUSF in my portfolio?

DXUV and AUSF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DXUV or AUSF?

DXUV has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to AUSF (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXUV dropped -21.08% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, DXUV or AUSF?

On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 27.33% vs 14.20% for AUSF. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DXUV or AUSF?

Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 27.33% return vs 14.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DXUV or AUSF?

DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DXUV or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.

What is the main difference between DXUV and AUSF?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DXUV and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.