DXUV vs. ABLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) and ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. DXUV is actively managed, while ABLD is passively managed. Over the past year, DXUV returned 26.14% vs 12.72% for ABLD. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DXUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ABLD.

Performance

DXUV vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXUV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than ABLD's 8.56% return.

DXUV

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.72%
• 6M: 10.30%
• YTD: 14.28%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.33%

ABLD

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 3.14%
• 6M: 1.06%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 1Y: 12.72%
• 3Y*: 9.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	$255.09K	$266.40K	$366.51K
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	$6.11M	$4.37M	$3.45M

DXUV vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	14.28%	14.34%	5.03%
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	8.56%	6.64%	-0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DXUV and ABLD is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	0.73

The correlation between DXUV and ABLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DXUV vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DXUV

DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 81
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 31
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DXUV vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DXUV	ABLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	0.81	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	1.18	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.16	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	1.04	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.56	2.42	+9.13

DXUV vs. ABLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXUV Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the ABLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXUV and ABLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DXUV vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXUV drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, which is greater than ABLD's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXUV and ABLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXUV	ABLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.08%	-19.35%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-11.64%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.34%	+7.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-4.14%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	4.99%	-2.91%

Volatility

DXUV vs. ABLD - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) at 2.62%. This indicates that DXUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXUV	ABLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	2.62%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.32%	12.91%	-3.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	14.94%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	17.36%	-0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	17.36%	-0.46%

DXUV vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ABLD's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DXUV vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison

DXUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than ABLD's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	3.54%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	0.97%	1.01%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DXUV and ABLD in my portfolio?

DXUV and ABLD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DXUV or ABLD?

DXUV has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to ABLD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXUV dropped -21.08% vs ABLD's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, DXUV or ABLD?

On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 26.14% vs 12.72% for ABLD. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ABLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DXUV or ABLD?

Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 26.14% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DXUV or ABLD?

DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ABLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DXUV or ABLD?

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.97% for DXUV.

What is the main difference between DXUV and ABLD?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DXUV and 0.39% for ABLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.