PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXR vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXR vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXR achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.05% return.


FTXR

1D
-0.02%
1M
11.32%
YTD
14.58%
6M
18.08%
1Y
43.09%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*

IGF

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
8.05%
6M
7.91%
1Y
15.30%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXR vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXR
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
14.58%14.70%17.09%20.93%-25.38%24.02%15.03%14.82%-15.27%15.82%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
8.05%21.31%14.81%6.14%-1.26%11.57%-6.50%25.82%-9.95%19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXR and IGF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.49

The correlation between FTXR and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTXR vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXR
IGF

Industrials

67.1%
38.8%

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%

-

Energy

0.6%
20.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

41.1%

Industrials

FTXR
67.1%
IGF
38.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FTXR
32.4%
IGF

-

Energy

FTXR
0.6%
IGF
20.1%

Basic Materials

FTXR

-

IGF

-

Communication Services

FTXR

-

IGF

-

Consumer Defensive

FTXR

-

IGF

-

Financial Services

FTXR

-

IGF

-

Healthcare

FTXR

-

IGF

-

Real Estate

FTXR

-

IGF
0.1%

Technology

FTXR

-

IGF

-

Utilities

FTXR

-

IGF
41.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXR vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXR
FTXR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FTXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXR vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXRIGFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.47

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

2.10

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.62

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.08

8.05

+2.03

FTXR vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXR and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXRIGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.47

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.73

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.24

+0.16

Drawdowns

FTXR vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXR drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXR and IGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXRIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.06%

-58.33%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-5.87%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.71%

-14.28%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-20.83%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-4.43%

+3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-11.87%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

1.90%

+2.39%

Volatility

FTXR vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.68%. This indicates that FTXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXRIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

3.68%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.48%

8.59%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

10.49%

+11.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

13.99%

+9.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.75%

16.83%

+7.92%

FTXR vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXR vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than IGF's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXR
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
1.14%1.52%2.13%1.50%2.38%0.67%0.33%1.34%1.74%1.18%0.24%0.00%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.98%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXR and IGF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXR has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to IGF (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXR dropped -52.06% vs IGF's -58.33%.

On 5-year performance, IGF leads with 10.15% vs 6.66% for FTXR. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGF has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXR.

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.14% for FTXR.

FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXR and 0.39% for IGF.

FTXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXR and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer