FTXR vs. ITB
FTXR (First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXR is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXR returned 8.63%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for ITB. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.
Performance
FTXR vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXR achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 0.36% return.
FTXR
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- —
ITB
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- -1.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
FTXR vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 16.44% | 14.70% | 17.09% | 20.93% | -25.38% | 24.02% | 15.03% | 14.82% | -15.27% | 15.82% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.36% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXR and ITB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FTXR and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTXR vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXR
ITB
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
FTXR
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
FTXR
ITB
Energy
FTXR
ITB
-
Basic Materials
FTXR
-
ITB
Communication Services
FTXR
-
ITB
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXR
-
ITB
-
Financial Services
FTXR
-
ITB
-
Healthcare
FTXR
-
ITB
-
Real Estate
FTXR
-
ITB
Technology
FTXR
-
ITB
-
Utilities
FTXR
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXR vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
FTXR
ITB
FTXR vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXR | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.02 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | -0.07 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | -0.13 | +8.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXR vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXR drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXR and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXR | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.06% | -86.53% | +34.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -26.04% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -33.35% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -40.55% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -23.92% | +22.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.95% | -37.02% | +26.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 14.00% | -9.74% |
Volatility
FTXR vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) is 6.37%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that FTXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXR | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 10.84% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 22.25% | -5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 30.26% | -8.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 29.51% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 30.14% | -5.42% |
FTXR vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXR vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than ITB's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 0.97% | 1.52% | 2.13% | 1.50% | 2.38% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 1.34% | 1.74% | 1.18% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.67% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXR and ITB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to FTXR (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXR dropped -52.06% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 5-year performance, FTXR leads with 8.63% vs 8.49% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FTXR has been the lower-risk option at 6.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXR has performed better with a 8.63% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXR.
FTXR has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.67% for ITB.
FTXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ITB is Building & Construction. FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXR and 0.38% for ITB.
FTXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXR and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer